Trump's Imperialist Dreams: A Far Cry from Fiscal Conservatism
The costs associated of buying Greenland, potentially invading Panama, and Canada as 51st State, so grandiose. Plus ongoing expenses of governing new territories. NOT CONSERVATIVE VALUES.
Editor's Note: At Pickaxe News, we don't take sides in the GOP-DEM divide. Instead, we aim to expose a deeper issue: how our debt-based economic system, fueled by currency debasement, robs citizens of their hard-earned rewards.
Our reporting highlights a troubling pattern: once in power, politicians often make deals with war profiteers and bankers that don't serve the public interest. We believe this system undermines true prosperity for ordinary people.
Our goal is to spark critical thinking about these entrenched systems and inspire dialogue on alternatives. We hope to contribute to the emergence of a new paradigm that genuinely serves all citizens, not just the powerful few.
In a startling turn of events, President-elect Donald Trump has unveiled a series of ambitious plans that starkly contrast his campaign promises of fiscal responsibility and government efficiency.
From sending his son, Donald Trump Jr., to Greenland to expressing interest in purchasing the Danish territory and even suggesting the annexation of Panama and the addition of Canada as the 51st state, Trump's recent announcements have left many wondering about the direction of his upcoming presidency.
Trump's renewed interest in acquiring Greenland, which he deems "an absolute necessity" for U.S. national security, has been met with firm resistance from both Greenland and Denmark.
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has echoed Greenland Prime Minister MĂște Bourup Egede's assertion that "Greenland is not for sale," dismissing Trump's proposal as "absurd.".
Despite this, Trump has not ruled out the use of military or economic coercion to gain control of the strategically important island.
The President-elect's expansionist agenda doesn't stop at Greenland. He has also expressed interest in reclaiming control of the Panama Canal, threatening military action if Panama doesn't lower fees for American vessels. Furthermore, Trump has proposed incorporating Canada as the 51st state of the U.S., which has understandably provoked Canadian officials.
These grandiose plans starkly contrast with Trump's campaign rhetoric, emphasizing reducing foreign involvement and prioritizing domestic issues.
During his campaign, Trump tapped figures like Elon Musk to discuss budget responsibility and even proposed a "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE).
The shift from fiscal conservatism to what appears to be a modern form of imperialism is jarring. It raises serious questions about such endeavors' economic feasibility and geopolitical implications.
Trump's expansionist dreams harken back to the 19th-century ideology of Manifest Destiny, the belief in America's divine right to expand across the continent.
However, such unilateral actions could have severe diplomatic and economic consequences in today's interconnected global economy. The proposed expansion to Greenland, Panama, and Canada represents a form of nation-building or imperialism opposed to the principles of fiscal conservatism Trump once championed.
The economic implications of these ambitious plans are staggering. Under a constrained monetary system, such as the gold standard advocated by economists like Ludwig von Mises, it's highly questionable whether the U.S. would have the financial means to pursue such expansionist policies. The costs associated with purchasing Greenland, potentially invading Panama, and integrating Canada into the U.S. would be astronomical, not to mention the ongoing expenses of governing these new territories.
Moreover, Trump's plans ignore the complex realities of international relations and domestic economics.
His earlier promises of mass deportations and building a wall along the Mexican border already faced significant challenges. If such policies were implemented, the construction and hospitality industries, which rely heavily on immigrant labor, would likely face severe workforce shortages.
The dissonance between Trump's campaign promises and recent announcements is particularly striking when considering his previous emphasis on fiscal responsibility.
During his campaign, Trump positioned himself as an outsider who would bring business acumen to government, promising to reduce waste and increase efficiency.
The "dreamboat" notion that you form even form a Department of Government Efficiency? Remember, these frightening nine words, "I am with the government and here to help," were meant to symbolize this commitment to streamlining operations and cutting costs.
However, the current trajectory suggests that Trump has embraced a more traditional, expansionist view of presidential power. This approach, reminiscent of the Federal Reserve's monetary policies that economists like von Mises criticized, relies on expanding the money supply to fuel a debt-based economic model.
Such a strategy is fundamentally at odds with the principles of fiscal conservatism and sound money that Trump once appeared to endorse.
The shift in Trump's rhetoric and policy proposals raises essential questions about the nature of political campaigns and the realities of governance.
It's not uncommon for politicians to adjust their positions once in office, but the scale of Trump's reversal is unprecedented in modern American politics.
From promising to "drain the swamp" and reduce government overreach, Trump seems poised to embark on one of the most ambitious expansions of American territory and influence in over a century.
As we approach Trump's inauguration, we must critically examine these proposals and their potential impacts.
Such expansionist policies have immense economic costs, diplomatic ramifications, and logistical challenges.
Moreover, they represent a fundamental departure from the principles of limited government and fiscal responsibility that many of Trump's supporters believed they were voting for.
Ultimately, Trump's recent announcements are a stark reminder of the often wide gap between campaign promises and governing realities. As the nation prepares for a new administration, citizens, policymakers, and the media must hold our leaders accountable and critically evaluate the long-term consequences of such dramatic shifts in policy.
The coming months will reveal whether Trump's imperialist dreams are merely provocative rhetoric or a genuine blueprint for a radically different American future.
end of segment
fun fact
âA man a plan a canal, Panamaâ spelled backwards also reads âA man a plan a canal, Panamaâ
Our opinions are not the opinions of our sponsors.
The editorial department and promotions department are sole and separate.
Not financial advice
The Pickaxe does not prefer Biden over Trump, Trump over Biden, or Donkeys over Elephants (DEMS over GOP)
Our leaning on the Political Spectrum is more libertarian.
And therefore critical of these massive Government spending programs that require enormous amounts of money printing (currency debasement)